PASSED: Nuclear Arms Protocol - Printable Version +- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz) +-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html) +---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html) +----- Forum: World Assembly Center (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-35.html) +------ Forum: General Assembly (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-36.html) +------ Thread: PASSED: Nuclear Arms Protocol (/thread-1415.html) Pages:
1
2
|
PASSED: Nuclear Arms Protocol - Vibrant Coconuts - 12-30-2014 Quote: Forum topic RE: AT VOTE: Nuclear Arms Protocol - Vibrant Coconuts - 12-30-2014 This is a rehash of a previous failed effort to replace the ban on the use of nuclear weapons against civilians that Repeal "International Criminal Court" legalised. AT VOTE: Nuclear Arms Protocol - sandaoguo - 12-30-2014 It's... Okay, I guess, but I still wouldn't vote for it. Given the radius of nuclear explosions and the size of fallout zones, it would be practically impossible for a country to not have civilians within the nuclear bomb danger zone of key strategic military assets. Unless you're a large county with a large area of uninhabited land. I'm also pretty iffy on explicitly authorizing the use of nuclear weapons at all. Just one of y quirks thinking the WA should be there to promote peace and not lay down the legal justification for using weapons of mass destruction RE: AT VOTE: Nuclear Arms Protocol - Vibrant Coconuts - 12-30-2014 It's an unnecessarily conservative effort in my opinion. Trying to write legislation to suit the orcs is a fool's errand: regardless of the accommodations made, they'll vote against. He could have got something much more substantial through. RE: AT VOTE: Nuclear Arms Protocol - ProfessorHenn - 12-31-2014 Against. I wonder if we could do a vote within a WA resolution thread to determine the Delegate's vote. RE: AT VOTE: Nuclear Arms Protocol - Aramanchovia - 12-31-2014 You would need to speak to Tsu about that. I voted against too, but the majority of the region are for. RE: AT VOTE: Nuclear Arms Protocol - Kris Kringle - 01-01-2015 Each Delegate has their own WA voting policy, so you would have to talk to tsu, as Aram said. RE: AT VOTE: Nuclear Arms Protocol - Tsunamy - 01-01-2015 I've been making polls. So far a vast majority of TSP residents have been voting for (according to WA), but I'll vote in the direction our poll indicates. RE: AT VOTE: Nuclear Arms Protocol - Punchwood - 01-01-2015 I was not impressed by it and was tempted to vote no. However I thought about it for a while and in the end voted yes, but it's not the best thing I've voted for. RE: AT VOTE: Nuclear Arms Protocol - Tsunamy - 01-02-2015 (01-01-2015, 10:19 PM)Punchwood Wrote: I was not impressed by it and was tempted to vote no. However I thought about it for a while and in the end voted yes, but it's not the best thing I've voted for. Honestly, I voted no in the poll and would've personally voted "no" for the proposal. However, a majority (slight, but majority nonetheless) of WA nations voted "yes" in our regional poll, so I followed their desires. |