+- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz)
+-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html)
+---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html)
+----- Forum: Judicial District (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-49.html)
+------ Forum: Conference Room (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-272.html)
+------ Thread: Legality of our positions (/thread-2952.html)
Pages:
1
2
Legality of our positions - Ryccia - 08-16-2015
This is troubling.
As pointed out by Punchwood, there should be 4, not 3, Justices running the Court.
The law clearly says:
Quote:Section 1 - Composition and Powers
1. The High Court shall consist of four Court Justices.
What is your take on this?
Legality of our positions - ProfessorHenn - 08-16-2015
It's of three normal justices and the 4th is the appeal justice. I don't see anything wrong.
RE: Legality of our positions - Darkstrait - 08-16-2015
I don't really even see the issue.
RE: Legality of our positions - Ryccia - 08-16-2015
The law says that it has to be 4. A loophole, perhaps?
RE: Legality of our positions - Darkstrait - 08-16-2015
There will be four. Anyway, for a period, we had zero.
Legality of our positions - ProfessorHenn - 08-16-2015
Kris has told me to pass on the idea of quorum. The U.S. Senate has 100 members, but not all 100 need to be there for business.
RE: Legality of our positions - Ryccia - 08-16-2015
Oh. That seems reasonable.
RE: Legality of our positions - Darkstrait - 08-16-2015
Wonderful. Let's move on and worry about other things.
Henn, can you ask the admins for the password to the secret office?
RE: Legality of our positions - ProfessorHenn - 08-16-2015
"professorhennrulez"
RE: Legality of our positions - Darkstrait - 08-16-2015
Really.