+- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz)
+-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html)
+---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html)
+----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html)
+------ Forum: Voting Chamber (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-83.html)
+------ Thread: FAILED: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice (/thread-4463.html)
FAILED: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice - Ryccia - 09-16-2016
This is a vote on a motion to disapprove of the nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw for the position of Permanent Justice of the High Court of the South Pacific.
Pursuant to Article 1.2.2 of the Judicial Act, the procedures for voting are as follows:
Quote:2. The Assembly may reject the nominee by passing a disapproval vote with at least three-fourths support of those voting, which must be up for vote for five days.
Voters may vote 'Aye' should they disapprove of the nominee, 'Nay' should they approve, and 'Abstain' should they choose to abstain from voting.
The motion requires 75% of voters to vote in favour in order to pass. The voting period will last for 5 days
Debate on the motion can be viewed here.
Voting will conclude on Wednesday, September 21, 2016, at 8:25 PM/20:25 (UTC -4). A countdown timer is available here.
RE: AT VOTE: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice - Yuno - 09-16-2016
lol aye<3
RE: AT VOTE: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice - Langburn - 09-16-2016
Damn it, didn't read the motion properly. Accidentally voted aye when I meant to vote nay.
RE: AT VOTE: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice - Sheriffs Secret Police - 09-17-2016
I want him to be justice.
RE: AT VOTE: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice - Seraph - 09-17-2016
(09-16-2016, 10:30 PM)Gradea Wrote: Damn it, didn't read the motion properly. Accidentally voted aye when I meant to vote nay.
You can undo your vote.
RE: AT VOTE: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice - Yuno - 09-17-2016
Oh shoot I misread it too
I meant nay x_x
<3JOSH
RE: AT VOTE: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice - Belschaft - 09-21-2016
With 56 Approval votes vs. 12 disapproval votes amongst participating regional WA members, as the Local Council Representative to the Assembly I would like to assign the block vote in a manner that closest represents 82% Nay whilst using only whole numbers. Expecting the block vote to equal six votes, that would be best represented by 5 Nay votes and one Aye vote.
RE: AT VOTE: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice - Ryccia - 09-22-2016
Results
With 44.4% in Aye votes and 55.6% in Nay votes, this disapproval vote has failed.
RE: AT VOTE: Disapproval Vote for the Nomination of Joshua Ravenclaw as Permanent Justice - W. Charlesfort - 09-22-2016
*sigh* when will the masses finally learn from their mistakes....