+- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz)
+-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html)
+---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html)
+----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html)
+----- Thread: Electoral Reform legislation (/thread-4480.html)
RE: Electoral Reform legislation - Belschaft - 10-02-2016
Motion to vote.
RE: Electoral Reform legislation - Farengeto - 10-02-2016
Is it really wise to do this in the middle of elections? To avoid potential constitutional issues I request this vote be delayed until after voting is held.
RE: Electoral Reform legislation - Belschaft - 10-02-2016
I have no problem with the vote not occurring till after the elections conclude.
RE: Electoral Reform legislation - Griffindor - 10-02-2016
I do second this. As soon as elections end, this can go to vote
RE: Electoral Reform legislation - Roavin - 10-02-2016
We could spend the time in the meanwhile cleanly separating the concerns.
RE: Electoral Reform legislation - Belschaft - 10-02-2016
What do you mean by "separating the concerns"?
RE: Electoral Reform legislation - Omega - 10-04-2016
This will be brought to a vote once elections end and a final draft is ready.
RE: Electoral Reform legislation - Drugged Monkeys - 10-05-2016
Are we going to separate this into two votes on the different changes? I.E. The election process, and the recall procedure
RE: Electoral Reform legislation - Omega - 10-05-2016
(10-05-2016, 07:57 AM)Drugged Monkeys Wrote: Are we going to separate this into two votes on the different changes? I.E. The election process, and the recall procedure
Legally we don't have to, but if you want me to I can.
RE: Electoral Reform legislation - Roavin - 10-05-2016
'Tis what I meant by separating the concerns
Gesendet von meinem Xtouch mit Tapatalk