+- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz)
+-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html)
+---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html)
+----- Forum: Judicial District (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-49.html)
+------ Forum: Conference Room (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-272.html)
+------ Thread: [HCLQ1712] Private Discussion (/thread-5623.html)
RE: [HCLQ1712] Private Discussion - Aav Whitehall - 11-07-2017
Umm. Okay. I may not have a ton of time for that. I couldn't find forum thread for them all, so I'll take my best stab at it.
RE: [HCLQ1712] Private Discussion - Aav Whitehall - 11-07-2017
Hey!! The first one I found was one you submitted!
[HCLQ1712] Private Discussion - Kris Kringle - 11-07-2017
Every case should have a forum thread, linked in ORCS. Let me know if any case doesn't.
Do you think you'd be able to have this by Thursday night?
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
RE: [HCLQ1712] Private Discussion - Aav Whitehall - 11-08-2017
Possibly. Those cases I named don't to the best of my recollection.
RE: [HCLQ1712] Private Discussion - Aav Whitehall - 11-08-2017
This is the summary of HCLQ1407. View attached text file for complete summary.
This established no authority for the court, and quoted the charter in three locations. However, this is from 2014, and I am not sure if it is still legal precedent.
[HCLQ1712] Private Discussion - Kris Kringle - 11-09-2017
Just for the record, I've checked and every case has a corresponding link. It should be under Case Link.
Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
RE: [HCLQ1712] Private Discussion - Aav Whitehall - 11-09-2017
Yes. They just aren't hyperlinks.
RE: [HCLQ1712] Private Discussion - Kris Kringle - 11-12-2017
I'm sorry I took this long to reply, I've been rather busy with work and then finishing the response to HCLQ1711. With that out of the way, we can focus fully on this case.
I will be sending requests for testimony and CC you. In the meantime, I would really need you to work on the summaries. To clarify, they should be short paragraphs where you explain what the Court decided and, if the information is available, how it reached its decision, what criteria were used, and what kind of contradiction was being challenged. I don't mean that you should write an essay; a short paragraph per each ruling is enough, if you include all the relevant information.
I ask this because we need to know what kind of precedent there is about solving contradictions: has the Court addressed only contradictions that affect people's rights and refused to consider other types? Has the Court used certain similar criteria, across rulings, when solving contradictions? We'll be able to know once we have the summaries of the rulings.
Let me know what you think.
I will be sending requests for testimony and CC you. In the meantime, I would really need you to work on the summaries. To clarify, they should be short paragraphs where you explain what the Court decided and, if the information is available, how it reached its decision, what criteria were used, and what kind of contradiction was being challenged. I don't mean that you should write an essay; a short paragraph per each ruling is enough, if you include all the relevant information.
I ask this because we need to know what kind of precedent there is about solving contradictions: has the Court addressed only contradictions that affect people's rights and refused to consider other types? Has the Court used certain similar criteria, across rulings, when solving contradictions? We'll be able to know once we have the summaries of the rulings.
Let me know what you think.
RE: [HCLQ1712] Private Discussion - Aav Whitehall - 11-15-2017
Will do.
RE: [HCLQ1712] Private Discussion - Kris Kringle - 11-20-2017
I'm afraid we didn't have time to properly walk you through the legal question process. That is my fault. I hope you can stick around for any future cases, so we can do it right this time, and you can have some practical experience in how to handle legal questions. I'm sure you'll do a great job, once given the chance.