[DISCUSSION + AT QUORUM] Wet Market Safety Act - Printable Version +- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz) +-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html) +---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html) +----- Forum: World Assembly Center (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-35.html) +------ Forum: General Assembly (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-36.html) +------ Thread: [DISCUSSION + AT QUORUM] Wet Market Safety Act (/thread-8139.html) |
[DISCUSSION + AT QUORUM] Wet Market Safety Act - Concrete Slab - 04-29-2020 DISCUSSION THREAD
Wet Market Safety Act
A resolution to enact uniform standards that protect workers, consumers, and the general public.
Category: Regulation | Area of Effect: Consumer Protection | Propsed by: Gremenia | Voting Thread
Quote:RECOGNIZES that wet markets across the globe may partake in the trade of live animals and wild and exotic animals, exposing the world population to dangerous infectious disease. NOTICE: PLEASE USE THIS THREAD FOR DISCUSSION ABOUT THE WA PROPOSAL ONLY. PLEASE USE the Voting Thread for Voting. We encourage you to state your opinion, regardless of your legislatorship status. RE: [DISCUSSION + AT QUORUM] Wet Market Safety Act - Concrete Slab - 04-29-2020 First off, this proposal has poor grammatical structure. Every clause should end in a comma, not a period. Also, the proposal seems to contradict itself in clauses 3 and 4 when it "permits the sale of domesticated slaughtered animals deemed safe for human consumption," but also "prohibits the trade of wild and exotic animals, alive or deceased, and any parts of those animals including skins, bones, and meat and other products in wet markets." The proposal also does not define what is "deemed sanitary" or what safety measures must be met. I will most likely be voting against. RE: [DISCUSSION + AT QUORUM] Wet Market Safety Act - Somyrion - 04-29-2020 (04-29-2020, 11:16 AM)Concrete Slab Wrote: "wild and exotic animals" as products that are derived from non-domesticated animals or plants usually extracted from their natural environment or raised under controlled conditions Is it just me, or does this clause make no sense? Why are plants included if it's defining animals? Products that are derived from...plants...raised under controlled conditions? So dandelion greens are wild and exotic animals? I'm automatically suspicious of anything targetting "wet markets", especially in these times. It's worth a reminder that your trendy local farmers market -- yes, that's a wet market. A textbook example of a wet market, too. They're not just scary exotic foreign things. RE: [DISCUSSION + AT QUORUM] Wet Market Safety Act - Concrete Slab - 04-29-2020 (04-29-2020, 12:25 PM)Somyrion Wrote:(04-29-2020, 11:16 AM)Concrete Slab Wrote: "wild and exotic animals" as products that are derived from non-domesticated animals or plants usually extracted from their natural environment or raised under controlled conditions There was also no drafting of this proposal on the forums. Kinda sketch. RE: [DISCUSSION + AT QUORUM] Wet Market Safety Act - rosaferri - 04-30-2020 I'm for this just because it's my personal belief that these markets should be regulated for the sake of ensuring sale of fish + sea plants that are endangered or exotic, but of course, this comes at heavy regret for the way it's written. I personally would vote for, but I wouldn't wholly recommend this resolution as it is. If it gets denied, I'd move towards rewriting this for the sake of making it more understandable in a better format. RE: [DISCUSSION + AT QUORUM] Wet Market Safety Act - Concrete Slab - 05-02-2020 (04-30-2020, 04:28 PM)rosaferri Wrote: I'm for this just because it's my personal belief that these markets should be regulated for the sake of ensuring sale of fish + sea plants that are endangered or exotic, but of course, this comes at heavy regret for the way it's written. I personally would vote for, but I wouldn't wholly recommend this resolution as it is. If it gets denied, I'd move towards rewriting this for the sake of making it more understandable in a better format. I'm also for restrictions on these types of markets, but we shouldn't settle for poorly written proposals. |