Let me present your above post in a different fashion:

There is suspicion in the Cabinet that an administrator may have misused his privileges, and concern that current guidelines may not be adequate to prevent future abuse.


What is my point? You cannot say that people shouldn't criticise the coup because the other side did stuff. If I behaved improperly, what I expect is for people to take their concerns to my superior. I don't expect the Cabinet to hold on to that and suddenly say we were unwilling to compromise. What is more, I don't expect the Cabinet to commit something far worse that what I'm said to have done, and overthrow the whole government.

Let's keep things in perspective here. One administrator is accused of behaving improperly. A Cabinet is accused, and in fact openly admitted, of couping the region. What is more, this Cabinet has consistently spread lies about me and the whole administrative team, the most outstanding lie being that I was somehow shielded from losing citizenship. For the nth time: if people have legitimate concerns, which I'm sure there are, we have a Head Admin who can receive them, and give them due consideration.

Whatever problems people might have with me, and I'm well aware that several people are counting the days until I leave this region, they do not justify a coup, nor do they allow anyone to equate anything with the act of couping. It's not a matter of saying "the coup wouldn't have happened if you did X". The coup shouldn't have happened. Period.