Your honor, if I may, I would strongly urge the court to take a wide of possible interpretation without being illogical here.

Clearly, "members," "members of the Coalition" and "members of The South Pacific" are essentially one in the same — especially as they refer to Article 3.1, 3.2 and 3.4; That should rightfully include all nations within the in-game region of The South Pacific.

Commonsense would tell us that those who do not reside within the in-game right do not enjoy the same rights and protections, nor would forum visitors from other regions, and/or ambassadors who do not also have a nation within The South Pacific.

Any reading of "member" beyond those within the NationStates-constituted region would be a gross misunderstanding of the game dynamics.