We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac
#3

The Court accepts the plea of Not Guilty and acknowledges Belschaft as the counsel for the defence, affording him all the rights, privileges and responsibilities due in accordance with the Court Procedures Act.

The Court will now accept motions from the prosecution and the defence for the dismissal of the charges, the alteration of the allotted times for later stages of the process, the alteration of the charges and the recusal of the presiding judge. Motions will be subject to the following terms:
  • They must be clearly written
  • They must include a justification of their necessity, including any evidence or laws that might be applicable
The Court reserves the right to ask for further evidence or justification, as appropriate, and also reserves the right to deny frivolous or inadequately justified motions. The Court will not recognise motions submitted by individuals other than the Complainant, the Defendant and their respective Counsels.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System


Messages In This Thread
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-02-2017, 01:49 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Cormac - 09-04-2017, 06:23 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-04-2017, 06:28 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-05-2017, 04:39 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-05-2017, 08:03 AM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-05-2017, 11:22 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-06-2017, 05:32 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-06-2017, 06:02 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-06-2017, 07:19 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-08-2017, 09:51 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-08-2017, 10:07 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-09-2017, 02:18 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-10-2017, 07:50 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-10-2017, 09:29 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-13-2017, 12:12 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-17-2017, 04:01 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-17-2017, 05:09 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-17-2017, 05:26 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-19-2017, 11:39 AM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-19-2017, 12:01 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-22-2017, 04:55 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-25-2017, 11:32 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-26-2017, 12:03 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-26-2017, 12:16 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-26-2017, 12:46 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-26-2017, 01:23 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-26-2017, 01:55 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-26-2017, 02:06 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 10-11-2017, 12:13 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 10-11-2017, 02:56 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 10-12-2017, 02:13 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 10-14-2017, 08:01 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 10-15-2017, 01:44 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .