(09-16-2017, 05:33 PM)sandaoguo Wrote: Given the corruption displayed by Hileville, one person overseeing everything isn't a good idea. If the current ECs aren't doing a satisfactory job, then isn't the answer to replace them?

All of this stems from the Justice, CRS, and Admins not actually doing what the law intends. That is, the Election Commission being a permanent job, just like a justice in the High Court. If it were actually treate that way, then things would run more smoothly, I imagine. This isn't the first the complaint's been raised-- I usually tell the CRS and other admins that we aren't doing things the way the law says we should, pretty much every election.

Either way, making it two people plus the admin observer isn't the problem, and going to one person again history shows isn't a real solution.

Admins aren't even allowed to do anything in the election. So, frankly, the argument that any of us should be prohibited for running for office when literally, all we do is check the Vote Collector votes, is silly.

If we really want this, then we need to have an Election Commission area where we appoint people so everyone knows who they are. Really, they should be the PJ and two other people. Then there isn't an issue.