We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac
#33

The Court must remind the Defence that no conviction has taken place, nor has the evidence been accepted as proof of any crime. In compliance with the Court Procedures Act, the evidence and witnesses have been accepted for their subsequent use in the trial phase of this proceeding, where both the Prosecution and the Defence will have an opportunity to cross-examine them.

Given that no proof of guilt or conviction has been determined at this point, nor is one allowed by the law, the Court does not share the sentiment of the Defence that the Prosecution has failed to prove guilt. Such task is due in the incoming trial phase of this proceeding, rather than in the present phase. Until proven otherwise, following a fair trial, the Defendant remains an innocent individual in the eyes of the law and this Court.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System


Messages In This Thread
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-02-2017, 01:49 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Cormac - 09-04-2017, 06:23 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-04-2017, 06:28 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-05-2017, 04:39 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-05-2017, 08:03 AM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-05-2017, 11:22 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-06-2017, 05:32 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-06-2017, 06:02 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-06-2017, 07:19 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-08-2017, 09:51 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-08-2017, 10:07 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-09-2017, 02:18 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-10-2017, 07:50 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-10-2017, 09:29 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-13-2017, 12:12 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-17-2017, 04:01 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-17-2017, 05:09 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-17-2017, 05:26 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-19-2017, 11:39 AM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-19-2017, 12:01 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-22-2017, 04:55 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-25-2017, 11:32 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-26-2017, 12:03 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-26-2017, 12:16 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-26-2017, 12:46 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 09-26-2017, 01:23 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 09-26-2017, 01:55 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 09-26-2017, 02:06 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 10-11-2017, 12:13 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 10-11-2017, 02:56 PM
[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Kris Kringle - 10-12-2017, 02:13 PM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Roavin - 10-14-2017, 08:01 AM
RE: [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac - by Belschaft - 10-15-2017, 01:44 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .