[PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac |
Your honor,
procedurally, the matter is clear. The Court had determined on September 2 that enough preliminary evidence had been submitted to warrant a trial. The Court Procedures Act does not specify a further evaluation of sufficiency as part of the Pre-Trial period, and therefore the trial cannot be dismissed on these grounds. To address the claim by the Defense, the Defendant's posts in and of themselves constitute an act. Whether this warrants a conviction is a matter for the trial period. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |