I'm sorry I took this long to reply, I've been rather busy with work and then finishing the response to HCLQ1711. With that out of the way, we can focus fully on this case.

I will be sending requests for testimony and CC you. In the meantime, I would really need you to work on the summaries. To clarify, they should be short paragraphs where you explain what the Court decided and, if the information is available, how it reached its decision, what criteria were used, and what kind of contradiction was being challenged. I don't mean that you should write an essay; a short paragraph per each ruling is enough, if you include all the relevant information.

I ask this because we need to know what kind of precedent there is about solving contradictions: has the Court addressed only contradictions that affect people's rights and refused to consider other types? Has the Court used certain similar criteria, across rulings, when solving contradictions? We'll be able to know once we have the summaries of the rulings.

Let me know what you think.