The Court extends its thanks to Pencil Sharpeners and Malayan Singapura for their respective testimonies, and would like to ask them the following questions.

To Pencil Sharpeners:

• To what extent was the ban from the North Pacific relevant to the deliberations of the Local Council regarding the subsequent ban on Malayan Singapura?
  
• Do you consider the posts identified as 'bragging' to qualify as spam? Were they treated as such in the aforementioned deliberations? If not, were they considered to have violated any posting rules in force at the time of their posting?
  
• What constitutes a proper warning for the purposes of moderation in the Regional Message Board? Do the warnings or guidance given by any member of the region count towards the considerations of the Local Council?
  
• Were links 13-16, 19-23, 25 considered official warnings by the Local Council during the course of its deliberations?
  
• Does the Local Council have a formal moderation process that can be, and has been, applied to all members fairly and equally, without any unreasonable distinctions? Did it have one at the time of the alleged commission of the spam and of the imposition of the ban?
  
• Does the Local Council display in a public venue a reasonably easy to understand list of posting standards, and the moderation process that will accompany any violation of the same? Did it have one at the time of the alleged commission of the spam and the imposition of the ban?
  
• Was Malayan Singapura referred to any resource that contained posting rules, either while being warned, or separately, so he would know from a written and official source what behaviour was not permitted on the Regional Message Board?

To Malayan Singapura:

• Were you aware that your line of posting was contrary to the posting guidelines established by the Local Council?
  
• Were you informed of, referred to, or shown, said guidelines at any point between your first warning and your ban from the region?
  
• Did you consider the warnings given by various members, with the exception of those given by Most Benevolent Tyranny and SJS Republic, as official warnings from the Local Council?
  
• Why did you continue posting in such a way that you continued to be called out, either by the Local Council or by individual members of the region, on your behaviour and attitude?
  
• Do you believe a lack of ill intent is an excuse for ignoring or violating regional posting guidelines?
  

The Court reserves the right to ask additional questions.