We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Appeal to the Ban of Malayan Singapura
#15

Your honour,

In answer to your questions:
Sources [16], [18], and [22] from my first post clearly state that roleplaying should be done in our dedicated region, Knowhere. Source [17], while not from a government official, clearly states that the offence is double (or triple) posting. Source [23] clearly states that the bragging is an offence.

While the LC had no official warning structure in place at the time (and still doesn't, to the best of my knowledge), the opinions from RMBers, particularly regular ones, were valued, seeing as the moderation of the board was for the benefit of its users.

There was no publication of official warnings, as there were no official warnings. RMB moderation was always done on an informal basis, mainly because most users were able to exhibit common courtesy, and would stop doing something when told not to.

The standard employed by the LC was more about the volume of warnings, rather than individual ones themselves. The LC believed that Malayan Singapura was unlikely to change their ways due to ignoring a wide range of warnings from a range of both government and non-government RMB users.

There was no codified ruleset at the time, other than the 'no RMB recruiting' in the WFE, which is irrelevant to this case.

The public had no way of knowing what standards they were held to. Unless they were told about it. Like Malayan Singapura was. Repeatedly.

I believe the nature of the RMB makes it hard to deliver any objective moderation, given the eclectic range of topics, conversations of varying lengths, and constant stream of new users. The LC therefore, operated with lenience, waiting until many warnings had been given out before committing to action.

Article III section 3 applies to nations who had joined in good faith. Malayan Singapura had joined due to being banned from TNP, and stated that his time in TSP would be temporary (until the ban ended), and that his end goal was in TNP not TSP, thus we believed he was not here in good faith. The then COA Farengeto agreed, rejecting Malayan Singapura's legislator application, stating "After investigation of your TNP activities and motives for applying, your application has been rejected on the grounds you are seeking membership in bad faith."
Did some LC, MoRA, CRS stuff in the past. Do a lot of World Census stuff now.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Determination of Justiciability - by Kris Kringle - 01-11-2018, 02:01 PM
RE: Appeal to the Ban of Malayan Singapura - by Pencil Sharpeners - 01-25-2018, 08:41 PM
Opinion of the Court - by Kris Kringle - 03-05-2018, 01:00 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .