(05-29-2018, 05:52 AM)Roavin Wrote:

(05-29-2018, 05:02 AM)Escade Wrote: Since this issue was discussed in the cabinet, over a month ago, I have made the following major NSGP posts:

[...]

3. Posts related to the NSWF and the TNP Administration Matter

[...]

The last one is interesting because it connects back to posts that I made, IC, in relations to Europeia which I expressed remorse for in the FA channel.  Roavin in fact acknowledged that while the content of my post was accurate, it was the writing that he didn't like (and he had Cormac rewrite one of my posts).

Oh, I had Cormac rewrite one of your posts? That is fascinating news and the region should really know all about this. I hereby grant you permission to post anything relevant from my DMs with you to prove that I had Cormac do such a thing.

For some reason I suspect you won't deliver on it. It might be because it is yet another blatant lie.

I actually just remembered what this was about.

Just before I enacted the GP moratorium, I was once again telling Escade that her GP posts weren't helpful, this time in the Cabinet Office itself. Out of nowhere, she mentioned that Cormac had expressed his support for her statement. I countered by telling her to consider how Cormac would have said the same thing, however. Just to prove my point, I actually asked Cormac to rephrase the problematic post in his words and pasted that in the Cabinet Office (and nowhere else), hoping that she sees the difference. She responded with a sarcastic sneer and then went afk.

For reference, Escade's public post on GP:

Quote:You know what's really disappointing recently, Europeia becoming another tool of userite raider menace Balder and banning players from becoming citizens because your puppet masters just don't like them. The real disappointment here is how you ignore the real tragedy of Euro having become just a colony of invaderism\raiderism. It's really interesting to see a region that bans players because of their associations with TSP or defenders to lament anything at all.

The "rephrased" version by Cormac:

Quote:Europeia claims to be an independent and democratic region, but what kind of independent and democratic region rejects citizenship applicants based on dissent from established thinking? Europeia's tendency to prevent dissenting opinions from being heard in Europeia by blocking them from citizenship demonstrates that it isn't interested in real independence and democracy, it's interested in maintaining a pro-imperialist, pro-raider status quo that has existed in Europeia for years. This mentality has also spread to other regions in Europeia's sphere of influence, particularly Balder, with dissenting voices silenced in the name of security - but it's not about security, it's about ideological purity in a community that purports to be free of ideology.

I should note that my summary above doesn't adequately express Escade's dismissiveness or my desperate attempts to once again try to explain why the post was problematic in the first place. The Cormac thing was just a tangent of the overall argument. Escade dropping that little nugget of information into her above post, without the relevant context, is blatantly bad faith.

TL;DR: It's not a lie afterall, "only" a gross (and ostensibly malicious) misrepresentation.