or Create an account
  The South Pacific Hall of Historical Records Archives Fudgetopia Hall of Government Assembly of the South Pacific [DISCUSSION] Amendment to Article 4 of the Proscription Act (Judicial Review)

We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[DISCUSSION] Amendment to Article 4 of the Proscription Act (Judicial Review)
  • Offline Nat
    Court Nerd
  • ****
  • Joined:       Dec 2018
    Posts:       410
    Threads:       17
    Rep:       192
    Credits: 0¢
#24
12-26-2018, 02:22 AM

(12-24-2018, 08:48 AM)Amerion Wrote: --[quotes removed]--

@Nat, Glen's post actually summarises my opinion on this matter quite nicely — while I have no issue with extending or clarifying existing legislative protection for and with regards to regions & organisations, I'm personally not in favour of going out of our way to help people who have been declared by the government as a being threat to TSP.

@Amerion, fair enough. While I would prefer the last suggestion I made (special leave), I would be satisfied with your original proposal and would happily vote for it.
Former Associate Justice of the High Court of the South Pacific (4 December 2019 to 5 February 2021)
[-] The following 1 user Likes Nat's post:
  • Amerion


Messages In This Thread
RE: [DISCUSSION] Judicial Review of Regional Prosciptions - by Nat - 12-26-2018, 02:22 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



  The South Pacific Hall of Historical Records Archives Fudgetopia Hall of Government Assembly of the South Pacific [DISCUSSION] Amendment to Article 4 of the Proscription Act (Judicial Review)


Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .