On a purely personal basis, given that I have no participation in this appeal, that is a misrepresentation of the facts. A case is decided when the appropriate ruling is posted; said ruling explains the decision that was reached and explains in detail why said decision was reached, including the evidence reviewed and the legal arguments considered.

The truth is that the case is yet to be decided because a decision is yet to be posted. Until such a time as a decision is posted, the Court is free to change its tentative conclusion, receive additional evidence for its consideration, or otherwise reconsider what it previously thought was legally sound. In addition, the case in question is on hold because the legality of plea bargains is being challenged. It would be unbecoming for the Court to use a power that is under legal review. A lack of activity for the case does not in any way constitute the presence of a decision.