or Create an account
  The South Pacific Government District High Court [LQ] [2106.HQ] Legality of Embassy Closure Operations

We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Legal Question (interpret the meaning and application of a law) [2106.HQ] Legality of Embassy Closure Operations
  • Offline Kris Kringle
    Chief Justice
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       15,572
    Threads:       778
    Rep:       1,751
    Credits: 2,936,500¢
#8
08-10-2021, 02:48 PM

HIGH COURT OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC
[2106.HQ] LEGALITY OF EMBASSY CLOSURE OPERATIONS AGAINST REGIONS THAT ESPOUSE HATEFUL IDEOLOGIES
10 Aug 2021

On the matter of the propriety of the involvement of Justice Roavin in the present case given their simultaneous role as a member of the General Corps, the request by HumanSanity is granted and Justice Roavin is hereby recused from this case.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
[-] The following 3 users Like Kris Kringle's post:
  • Apatosaurus, Moon, Rebeltopia
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Notice of Reception - by Kris Kringle - 08-05-2021, 10:08 AM
Determintion of Justiciability - by Kris Kringle - 08-10-2021, 11:02 AM
RE: [2106.HQ] Legality of Embassy Closure Operations - by Kris Kringle - 08-10-2021, 02:48 PM
Opinion - by Kris Kringle - 10-12-2021, 03:34 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



  The South Pacific Government District High Court [LQ] [2106.HQ] Legality of Embassy Closure Operations


Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .