[2208.HQ] Requirement of in-game consent for A2205.05 Amendment to Article XIV

We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Legal Question (interpret the meaning and application of a law) [2208.HQ] Requirement of in-game consent for A2205.05 Amendment to Article XIV

Domais
The Domster!
Joined: Sep 2020

Posts: 235

Threads: 9

Rep: 34

Credits: 0¢

05-31-2022, 03:16 PM

HIGH COURT OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC
AMICUS BRIEF

ARGUMENT
Your Honor,

This case is not justiciable because Article 13, Section Two of the Charter gives the Chair and the Chair alone the power to determine whether or not an amendment affects the gameside community. Therefore, to rule against the Chair would be a usurpation of the Chair's authority as the Court has not been granted the authority to review the decision of the Chair.

Submitted to the High Court of the South Pacific

Messages In This Thread

[2208.HQ] Requirement of in-game consent for A2205.05 Amendment to Article XIV - by Belschaft - 05-31-2022, 02:14 PM

Notice of Reception - by Kris Kringle - 05-31-2022, 02:46 PM

RE: [2208.HQ] Requirement of in-game consent for A2205.05 Amendment to Article XIV - by Domais - 05-31-2022, 03:16 PM

RE: [2208.HQ] Requirement of in-game consent for A2205.05 Amendment to Article XIV - by sandaoguo - 05-31-2022, 09:55 PM

Determination of Justiciability - by Kris Kringle - 06-01-2022, 10:58 AM

RE: [2208.HQ] Requirement of in-game consent for A2205.05 Amendment to Article XIV - by Belschaft - 06-01-2022, 11:00 AM

RE: [2208.HQ] Requirement of in-game consent for A2205.05 Amendment to Article XIV - by Belschaft - 06-01-2022, 11:05 AM

In-Chambers Opinion - by Kris Kringle - 06-01-2022, 03:19 PM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)