(09-06-2022, 11:34 PM)Comfed Wrote: (09-06-2022, 11:14 PM)Trivalve Wrote: (09-06-2022, 11:12 PM)Comfed Wrote: I would argue that your "criteria" for banjection are irrelevant, unless you can outline a way to mechanically enforce them.
Well if the criteria is intentionally not met, then removal of BC powers would occur along with the possibility of losing position as LC.
Regardless, the intent should be to prevent abuse of Border Control powers in the first place.
Well wouldn't the threat of losing your position as LC help in preventing it from happening?
(This post was last modified: 09-07-2022, 12:15 AM by Trivalve.)
Reply