I wish to stress the fact that this should not be made a regular occurrence, but I also acknowledge that in this particular case it is in the best public interest to exercise a certain degree of transparency.

The Court voted in favour of justiciability in the interest of allowing for further opportunity for review. This has no bearing on what the Court may ultimately rule. It is entirely possible that the Court may rule that deference ought to be given to the Chair and that no sufficiently egregious cause was found that would warrant corrective action. It is entirely possible that the Court may rule the opposite. The fact remains that the Court wished to hear those arguments in further detail and that an admitted case is the best venue to do so.