Does anybody feel it is our responsibility to respond to the issue in this thread? I am thinking not. One of us should possibly respond to the thread at least, seeing as Tsu has requested our opinion.

Interesting point, the Charter seems to allow the Cabinet to remove citizenship for being a security threat, but it appears silent on this being a legitimate reason to reject citizenship in the first place from my reading. It could be argued that rejecting someone for this reason is actually acting against the Charter. I'm not sure it is the time to point that out though.