Poll: Should this amendment to the Military Code be passed? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
Aye | 19 | 79.17% | |
Nay | 3 | 12.50% | |
Abstain | 2 | 8.33% | |
Total | 24 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Amendment to Article 2.3 of the Military Code |
The following is an amendment to the Military Code. Voting will remain open for three days and requires 50%+1 support to pass.
The amendment removes the Vice Delegate from the list of persons to be endorsed by SPSF members, as the position had been abolished at the recent Great Council. The debate concerning the proposed amendments can be found here. The vote will end on 03 July 2016 at 4:40pm (GMT+8) A countdown timer is available here. Quote:(3) SPSF members are required to return their WA nation or WA status, if not being used, to a nation in The South Pacific and endorse the Delegate, Vice Delegate, and the Council of Regional Security. Members are not forbidden to use it on other missions, but if not in use, they should reside in The South Pacific and endorse the relevant, aforementioned authorities. |
Messages In This Thread |
Amendment to Article 2.3 of the Military Code - by Awe - 06-30-2016, 04:40 AM
RE: Amendment to Article 2.3 of the Military Code - by Seraph - 06-30-2016, 04:50 AM
Amendment to Article 2.3 of the Military Code - by Omega - 06-30-2016, 09:38 AM
RE: Amendment to Article 2.3 of the Military Code - by Gordon Freeman - 06-30-2016, 01:41 PM
RE: Amendment to Article 2.3 of the Military Code - by Sheriffs Secret Police - 06-30-2016, 07:44 PM
RE: Amendment to Article 2.3 of the Military Code - by Awe - 07-03-2016, 12:10 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |