At Vote: Treaties Act |
(10-16-2016, 03:07 PM)Belschaft Wrote: This proposed act addresses all my concerns with the previously proposed legislation, and broadly reflects the principles and intent of the version drafted by DM and myself. As such I'm willing to withdraw that version and sign on to this one, assuming that DM has no issues with doing so. Aye. I agree as well that this version looks much better. Full Support. Semi-Unretired
|
Messages In This Thread |
At Vote: Treaties Act - by sandaoguo - 10-16-2016, 01:51 PM
RE: Treaties Act - by Seraph - 10-16-2016, 01:59 PM
RE: Treaties Act - by Omega - 10-16-2016, 02:43 PM
RE: Treaties Act - by Belschaft - 10-16-2016, 03:07 PM
RE: Treaties Act - by Ryccia - 10-16-2016, 06:46 PM
RE: Treaties Act - by Drugged Monkeys - 10-17-2016, 06:32 AM
RE: Treaties Act - by Altmoras - 10-17-2016, 07:55 PM
RE: Treaties Act - by Roavin - 10-19-2016, 04:38 PM
RE: Treaties Act - by Seraph - 10-19-2016, 04:45 PM
RE: Treaties Act - by Anapol - 10-20-2016, 11:45 PM
RE: Treaties Act - by Omega - 10-20-2016, 11:50 PM
RE: Treaties Act - by Roavin - 10-21-2016, 06:20 AM
RE: Treaties Act - by Anapol - 10-21-2016, 12:30 AM
Now At Vote - by Omega - 10-31-2016, 11:16 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |