(12-27-2016, 02:52 PM)Belschaft Wrote:

(12-27-2016, 02:49 PM)Roavin Wrote: I believe what Glen meant was that the Local Council decides for itself how it goes about proposing charter changes, writing the text, when and if it does it, etc.; but ultimately it still has to be proposed to the assembly.  That's how I interpreted it, anyway.

That was my interpretation. My own view is that this would essentially mean that the LC could put proposed Charter or Law changes to vote by the in-game region and then send them to the Assembly, rather than the other way round.

Ok ... but we know what happens in the Assembly. Who wants to explain to the 100-plus voting WA members why their legislation was radically altered?