Pursuant to the Court's ruling, Petitioner submits the entirety of the logs he previously provided for in camera review for consideration as part of the public record. The original logs are in three parts, shown in the following images:

https://pastebin.com/pzsfXucv
https://pastebin.com/fu8EZgZF
https://pastebin.com/PY7hGv1T

Petitioner also submits the annotated copy of the logs he previously provided to the Court:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jHYV...sp=sharing

These logs should not be in this case because it is clear that they do not support the allegation for which the Cabinet cited them that Petitioner "attempted to sabotage military operations of The South Pacific, outside of normal raiding and defending dynamics."  They show a fairly typical if frank discussion between regional representatives after an incident that caused tensions between the regions. Discussions like this happen all the time in NationStates. They are not attempts to sabotage regions, they are diplomacy. However, given that the Cabinet maintains its allegations based on these logs, Petitioner requests the Court consider them and provides them in open Court as required by the Judicial Act now the Court has concluded no redaction is needed.