[PASSED] Sunshine Act Disclosure for High Court Discussions |
Esteemed Legislators,
A few weeks ago I was reading the Sunshine Act, which says that discussions related to the High Court should be disclosed "no later than 6 months after the ruling or, if appealed, the ruling on the appeal, has been announced". I also noticed that, according to Article I, Section 3 of the Criminal Code, the Cabinet is the institution tasked with authorising the disclosure of private information not originated in the Assembly or the Council on Regional Security. I am not sure whether the Court can disclose information, in compliance with the Sunshine Act, without Cabinet authorisation, which in itself would be quite burdensome. I felt the issue is ambiguous enough that a discussion was merited, to decide whether a legislative fix to clarify the issue would be in order. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System |
Messages In This Thread |
[PASSED] Sunshine Act Disclosure for High Court Discussions - by Kris Kringle - 11-03-2018, 08:01 PM
RE: Sunshine Act Disclosure for High Court Discussions - by Amerion - 11-04-2018, 04:39 AM
RE: Sunshine Act Disclosure for High Court Discussions - by Amerion - 11-12-2018, 08:54 AM
RE: Sunshine Act Disclosure for High Court Discussions - by Roavin - 11-04-2018, 07:44 AM
RE: [DISCUSSION] Sunshine Act Disclosure for High Court Discussions - by Nakari - 11-12-2018, 08:56 AM
RE: [AT VOTE] Sunshine Act Disclosure for High Court Discussions - by Amerion - 11-12-2018, 09:18 AM
RE: [PASSED] Sunshine Act Disclosure for High Court Discussions - by Amerion - 11-15-2018, 09:46 AM
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |