To the contrary, the Court struck down the proscription of EWS because the publically made allegations were not substantiated by the evidence presented. If the Cabinet or CRS wants to proscribe someone for doing X, then they need to have evidence that they did X.

In EWS' case you did not. I once again invite you to declassify Item E, which you continue to rely on to make your argument whilst not letting anyone else see it. Of the "7 people across 2 Cabinets" how many actually saw Item E, and how many were told they couldn't but should take your word at it?

EWS' case is a clear example of why judicial overview is so important; so that security officials can't hide behind secrecy, using it to misrepresent evidence.