We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Legal Question (interpret the meaning and application of a law) [1908] Legality of Ejections for Conduct Violations
#11

(04-02-2019, 06:00 PM)Nat Wrote:
(04-01-2019, 09:38 AM)sandaoguo Wrote: It’s not true that “there is no written guideline which stipulates that action by NationStates moderators is sufficient proof of a conduct violation.” The Criminal Code *is* the guideline.

The Criminal Code states that "Conduct violations shall be defined as breaking in-game NationStates rules." Breaking the rules, not any moderator action arising from that, is the lone definition of conduct violations provided in the legislation. The law does not stipulate this region's process for determining when a conduct violation occurs, so there is in fact no written guideline which stipulates that action by NationStates moderators is sufficient proof of a conduct violation.  

The only people who decide when someone has broken NS rules are NS mods. If they have not made a decision, then the rules haven't been broken yet. (The same way we can't say someone is guilty of breaking our own laws, until the Court has delivered a verdict.) It's pretty simple. We do not need to have a side document explaining that.
[-] The following 3 users Like sandaoguo's post:
  • Lily Pad, Rebeltopia, Volaworand
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [Legal Question] Border Control - by Awe - 03-03-2019, 12:34 PM
Determination of Justiciability - by Kris Kringle - 03-11-2019, 10:27 PM
RE: [1908] Legality of Ejections for Conduct Violations - by sandaoguo - 04-03-2019, 03:37 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .