We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Legal Question (interpret the meaning and application of a law) [1909] Standard Moderation Policy
#1

The charter states that:
Quote:(3) The Local Council may not be denied the authority to run regional polls, create and pin Dispatches, and to suppress messages on the Regional Message Board according to a standard moderation policy. However, it may not alter the regional flags or tags, and may not send out mass telegrams, without the approval of the Delegate.
However, the new LC (and actually also the previous LC) have the following policy:
Quote:Double-posting, or posting two posts in a row, is considered illegal on the RMB. To put multiple things in one post, it is advised for nations to use the edit tool or wait for another nation to post first.
Triple posting, or posting three posts in a row, is also considered illegal, as are any other number of posts more than one in a row. Repeated offences of triple posts and up will result in recommendation for banning.

The enforcement of this law in terms of double posting is up to the discretion of individual Councillors.
(This quote is specifically from the new dispatch)
I ask the court if this, specifically the bolded part, is actually a standard moderation policy, as it is not consistently enforced, as shown by this, a double post by Sword of Summer (although the second post was later deleted, it was originally suppressed), and this double post by Concrete Slab.
how am i even still a legislator at this point...?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
[1909] Standard Moderation Policy - by New Haudenosaunee Confederacy - 03-06-2019, 09:00 AM
Determination of Justiciability - by Kris Kringle - 03-11-2019, 10:16 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .