I submit to the Court that New Haudenosaunee Confederacy (hereinafter referred to as NHC) has defamated me by publicly accusing me of "Telegram Spam" in the following posts:

https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686903

new_haudenosaunee_confederacy;34686903 Wrote:It's basically spam, how do you expect me to react?

https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688531

new_haudenosaunee_confederacy;34688531 Wrote:If you didn't want that to happen, then you shouldn't spam my TGs. If I spammed your TGs, how would you react?

https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688546

new_haudenosaunee_confederacy;34688546 Wrote:He constantly did it and it was pointlessly flooding my inbox.

https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688145

new_haudenosaunee_confederacy;34688145 Wrote:I can't, you've gotten yourself blocked for flooding my inbox.
(btw you're missing a comma after "NHC")

https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688466

new_haudenosaunee_confederacy;34688466 Wrote:I'm not trying to change anything, that's a legal question, and I blocked you because you pointlessly flooded my inbox. If you didn't do that, you wouldn't have been blocked.

https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34687741

new_haudenosaunee_confederacy;34687741 Wrote:I only block TGs and notices. I blocked Slab (and SWAN, actually) for mention spam and you for TG spam. I haven't blocked Auphelia actually.

and finally after I posted:
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688344

volaworand;34688344 Wrote:Is there some reason you choose to subject the entire RMB to your continued griefing, instead of simply having a conversation about it privately?  In game TG's are universally available to every nation.  You deceided to close that avenue of communication and are trying to somehow claim that I did some horrible thing to you.  I sent you a telegram when I suppressed your posts.  we exchanged an equal number of TG's.  

You continued to double post.  

I sent a second TG when I suppressed a that post I sent the generic, "hey I suppressed your double post, here's how you can fix that and here's our guidelines" TG... then you deceided tht you didn't want to be open to communication.

You continued to double post.  

I went to send another TG alerting you the suppression, and what you can do about it.

You chose to block communication and continue double posting for what... an hour?

Yes, Being attacked and claiming that I somehow "spammed" someone is uncalled for. 

I wold suggest personal emails but you've already told me i should fear being stalked by you.  So, no In game communication is preferable.  Feel free to TG any suggestions.

He replied:
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688401

new_haudenosaunee_confederacy;34688401 Wrote:If I don't like your policy, I can express that and protest against it. If I think what you are sending me is unnecessary, then I have the right to block TGs from you. If you want to stop the RMB from being like this, then fix your policy.

Our Criminal Code Section 1(10) Defamation shall be defined as the communication of false or grossly misleading information about an individual to a recipient, for the purposes of damaging the standing of that individual and done so with a reckless disregard for its factual accuracy.

I do not challenge NHC's right to block emails, however his publicly stated a false reason harms my reputation.  I did not and never have engaged in Telegram spamming.  He admits as much in declaring it part of a protest.  These false allegations are damaging and clearly made with a reckless disregard for factual accuracy.

I ask the court to review the exchanges which make it clear that NHC blocked me for political reasons and then misrepresented his reasons for doing so publicly.