Your honourable justices,

I appeal against and seek to have the current case of Nakari vs Concrete Slab and North Prarie dismissed on the grounds of judicial misconduct and process violations.

I refer to the judicial act at article 2: Judicial Conduct

(1) Justices of the High Court shall 
a. rule upon what is written in law, and not be influenced by prejudice based on personal bias, corruption by undue influence, or discord.

Justice Belschaft, during the course of the case process, has stated in the agreement of a plea bargain, that "it is a logical extension"of the laws to accept a plea bargain. Whilst a legal question on the legality of such bargains is currently being sought. Without mention of the plea bargain in the judicial act, I submit that Justice Belschaft has veered from Article 2(1)(a) in that he has not ruled upon the written law, by entering into a plea agreement and also by seeking a change of Plea by North Prarie.

I further draw you attention to article 6 on sentencing within the judicial act.

(1) A sentencing case is started when an individual has been found guilty after being indicted. The case is started, if possible, by the justice that delivered the conviction.

In the case of Nakari v Concrete Slab and North Prarie, North Prarie no conviction has been delivered and no finding of guilty yet made by the court. As such no sentencing could take place by the Court. Further, the entering of an agreement may prejudice Concrete Slab's (the first respondent) case. As such, I submit that the Justices have failed to follow proper process, contrary to the Judicial Act.

In addition , I draw your attention to the Appeals process found at Article 7.

(2) An appeal may be filed by any member of the South Pacific or by any non-member with a vested interest in the case, for at least one of the reasons described in this article.

(3) Appeals may be submitted on grounds of process violations, contradictions of law, or judicial misconduct. For such an appeal, the assigned justice of the case being appealed is automatically recused from the appeal case.

As a member of the South Pacific, I therefore seek an appeal of the case on the grounds of process violations and judicial misconduct by the presiding Justices.

I thank the court for it's time