Folks — by this time in my long, long, long long NS career, I hope it comes as no surprised that I consider The South Pacific a region par excellence. I'm not saying we're perfect — although we're close! — but, I think much of what we've done has led the way in the game.

That's why we are the oldest democracy in the game (barring some hiccups), and continue to lead the way on democratic principles and participation. We were the first — and only GCR — to undertake a representative project like the Local Council where hundreds have voted for representation — and thousands have the possibly to. And, while Maxx knows it hasn't always been pretty, as a community we have remained committed to democracy, inclusion, diversity and camaraderie, even as we've had significant differences and policy prescriptions.

It's with that in mind that I address the entire region today, in general support of the military and foreign affairs alignment that is currently being discussed in the Assembly. I'll be the first to admit that I was and remain skeptical of labels, but after getting feedback from our current elected leadership, I can't help but think we have a unique opportunity here that we cannot afford to squander.

Setting aside both the rhetorical and the practical concerns for a minute, let me ask the following:

As a community, do we ...
believe that democracy is good and desirable?
value inclusion, diversity and kindness?
think NS would be better if we worked together, respected each other and built a friendly welcoming space for all?

Finally, if we can spread the values of TSP to ensure citizens of other regions enjoy what we hold dear, shouldn't we do that?

Here's the thing: I believe the "defender alignment" discussion has been framed incorrectly for a number of practical concerns — such as alliances and activity levels and what not. But, let's set those concerns aside for the moment. At the root of the matter, there is a need to help vulnerable regions within NS. In the past, this has been chalked up to "defending" as opposed to raiding, but, regardless, there are regions in need out there. By answering that need, we have a unique opportunity to help some regions, but also to spread the values the we hold dear.

Yes, it may come with the prospect of increased activity and the possibility of new alliances, if it doesn't — so be it! We are lucky to have wonderful allies like The North Pacific and The East Pacific who have indicated they will stand by us regardless of what we decide. And, we have a great security apparatus that will ensure the continued safety of our region. There are few practical reasons standing in the way.

As such, this is an opportunity for The South Pacific to lead the way and spread our values throughout the game.

Chances like this don't come about often. There have been a long line of prominent organizations that have worked to protect regions — ADN and FRA, among them — and, while working with any of those organizations would be in line with our values, the opportunity that lies before us now is bigger than being an auxiliary to other organizations.

We have the chance to lead and spread the democratic ideals we've nurtured for 15+ years far and wide. Better yet, we have elected officials willing and ready to do the work it takes to promote and defend the things we hold dear. The decision in front of us is whether want to take the mantle of "defender," but whether we want to help regions and, in the process, promote the values of democracy and TSP far and wide.

This isn't "aligning with existing defenders" as much as creating: "Defender: TSP Edition."

Few times has the possibility presented itself for TSP to truly step beyond our shores and show the game what we're made of. I hope we decide to seize the current opportunity because I want all of NS to know what makes TSP special.