(10-22-2016, 12:15 PM)sandaoguo Wrote: @Tsu: I would do something along the lines of framing all these clauses as prerequisites for subforums:

"Parties must have X members and be electorally active (tho I disagree on that) to qualify for a subforum. If a party fails to maintain these requirements for X amount of time, their subforum will be archived."

Edit: Also, just to provide some historical context here, because some are being very unfair to TIL and our private forums... We created our own forums because TSP administration decided not to create subforums for political parties. TSP's admins decided that because 1) parties were given the boogeyman treatment by a decent amount of influential players and 2) we didn't have any idea of how to create a set of standards without being accused of political bias.

As Roavin states, TIL has agreed to use a subforum here. We aren't some secret cabal meeting in hidden rooms-- our forum was created because we needed a place to organize, and we couldn't do it here without sacrificing common sense privacy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Can you make those changes within my proposal? I'm not exactly sure what type of reworking you're envisioning ...

I can verfiy that, as Glen said, it was an admin decision -- something I've suggested overturning in an effort to raise activity. While I can see the suspicion, the fact that the TIL is willing to move onto forums really shows no ill will or intention, so I think we can put that thought to rest.