What's so outrageous? Neither the Assembly nor the Local Council should be able to unilaterally amend the Charter. If the LC sends an amendment that the Assembly disagrees with, then it shouldn't pass. Much the same, if the Assembly sends an amendment to the LC that *it* disagrees with.

Perhaps the two ought to simply communicate and not blindly throw amendments at each other? We shouldn't have to codify that. The only reason I'm doing this now is that I don't believe I can effectively organize a debate of this on the RMB, without support from the current LC. And that's obviously lacking, given there's a vacancy and Bel and I are currently in a death match over the purpose of the LC altogether.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk