How can you legislate that someone informally lead something? That seems, well, contradictory.

--

I have to be honest. I think people are making mountains out of molehills with this particular topic. If there are issues with how the Local Council is working, then is certainly has enough leeway to modify its performance without purely legislative changes like having an informal head or adding more people. In fact, it is vastly preferable to avoid those changes.

Why?

Because these aren't issues related to structure. Let's start by acknowledging that the Local Council wasn't formed solely to run polls on bills, it was formed to find out how the gameside community could be better interested. Sure, running polls can be one part of that, but it can't be the only part. Issues in the Local Council will stop when we realise it's members aren't just messengers between Gameside and the Forum, they are supposed to lead within their own community.

That is the kind of change we need. It's something related to how we approach the job, not something they can be legislated away.