I agree with some of the fears people are raising based on party allegiance and CRS membership. I would like to know how Far plans on ensuring he has no conflicting interests between him and his party. As this is uncharted territory I think it is vital we know how he would keep himself unbiased and maintain the sanctity of the High Court. I recognize we have mechanisms in place for CRS CoI's and I would be interested in hearing how Far would ensure those are implemented appropriately.

(This is me being CoA): We are required to hold three days of debate as per the Judiciary Act. Assuming in my judgment, as per the Charter Article IV Section 5, sufficient debate has occurred (I'm 99% sure it will) and there has not been a motion and a second for a vote on the nominee, the nominee will stand confirmed.