(02-02-2017, 04:01 PM)Rebeltopia Wrote: I'm with Bels here. A year and a half ago, we had a huge assembly blow up over this issue rolled into CoA having the power to make even the smallest change to any law after its been passed. At that time, everyone wanted to go the route of Chair can't without assembly approval, and however the law is written is how it is written and if something was omitted, then it has to be reintroduced - even if they were accidently left out.

I'd say is easy enough that such a (re)addition be voted on for clarity of the situation.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk

We've gotten over petty freakouts like that, for the most part. It's common practice nowadays for the Chair to fix clerical errors themselves. You know, as reasonable people would agree.

Voting on this would still set a bad precedent. But I've proposed a procedure for amendments that would ensure the precedent ends up be irrelevant anyways.