Once this passes, it will be very hard to fix it, and I see a couple of problems with it - namely, that conflicts between various pairs of offices are surely not equivalent, especially considering that Delegate and CoA are no longer cabinet positions (with good reasoning!).

I would hope that this is intuitive that with our new Delegate role, the only conflict would be with an LC role. Delegate and MoFA - who cares, PM and MoFA - big problem, obviously.

There is no conflict between CoA and any other position except possibly the LC — and there are some legitimate arguments to be made why this may or may not be the case, and only as it currently stands (and we'll surely be tweaking the LC role a bit going forward, which would swing this in one or the other direction).

Furthermore, I hope that our court will interpret 7.6 sensibly and look not just at the name of foreign positions but at their responsibilities. TSP Delegate and TNP Delegate are two very different jobs, for instance.