(02-20-2017, 07:23 AM)Belschaft Wrote: (02-19-2017, 09:39 PM)Cormac Wrote: (02-19-2017, 09:25 PM)Belschaft Wrote: Sorry, there's a typo/ommision of the word "equivalent" there; the language isn't meant to be that broad. Corrected.
Much more reasonable. I can support that.
I do still have some concerns about the inclusion of deputies in this legislation though, not specifically related to (5), but just in general. This may just be a cultural difference, but I don't see any reason a legislative deputy couldn't serve in the executive, or vice versa.
I would have no problem with that, but others have argued for extremely strict separation provisions.
Ah, I see. I admit I haven't read back through the thread yet. In that case, I don't want to hold up a compromise.