So, I've also chatted with Roavin about this in the past few weeks and, whilst I do not think all of his suggestions in the OP are quite the right way to go about things, I think the idea of the Coalition being a real coalition of regions hold merit, not least because it would be an interested new move for GP and might liven up a scene which, by all accounts, is dying.

I think the various points against it made by folk in this thread seem valid, but that, actually, they could be incorporated into a new model of the region. There's no reason why the idealised vision of what the LC should be right now can't be the kind of government that the region keeps whilst the forum government stays largely the same, with some changes. I would suggest that the current cabinet structure remains, but with the MoMA and MoFA holding those positions for all member regions, whilst the MoRA will become more of an overseer or co-ordinator of various RA positions in each region, including the LC in the South Pacific, thus allowing regions to maintain a cultural identity whilst sharing good ideas and making sure activity is spread evenly.

In a model like this, we would also want to make sure that the Assembly of the coalition is representative of the member regions, bringing in folk from new members to ensure that the government is fair and representative.

Anyway, these are just my first few thoughts this morning and, since those who have said this would need a GC are quite right, I'll stop here.