We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance
#18

(02-20-2017, 09:45 PM)Roavin Wrote: The CRS would be split into two pieces. One piece is the Defense Council (DC), which is per-region and represent trusted nations with high endorsements and high influence helping to secure the region (in a UCR, the founder would be part ex officio I suppose). The other piece is called (ominously) the South Pacific Intelligence Agency (SPIA) which takes care of the security aspects, and is a coalition-wide institution.

Can we bury already the idea of an intelligence agency? It would be a tremendous waste of resources, and coupled with your imperialist idea, a potentially dangerous institution. This is not the real world, where there would always be plenty of intelligence gathering and analysing to be conducted. Things work differently in NationStates, and I like to think those who are in the Committee, or have been in the Committee, have enough experience to know when and how intelligence is needed.

There is a reason why our intelligence in 2011/2012 was sometimes called "Belschaft has friends", rather than "South Pacific Intelligence Agency".
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System


Messages In This Thread
[DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Roavin - 02-19-2017, 10:33 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Feirmont - 02-19-2017, 10:52 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Omega - 02-19-2017, 11:10 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Tsunamy - 02-20-2017, 01:08 AM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Escade - 02-20-2017, 03:17 AM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Seraph - 02-20-2017, 05:14 AM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Cormac - 02-20-2017, 07:46 AM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Tsunamy - 02-20-2017, 09:27 AM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Seraph - 02-20-2017, 09:13 AM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Roavin - 02-20-2017, 09:45 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Roavin - 02-20-2017, 10:03 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Roavin - 02-21-2017, 06:57 AM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Kris Kringle - 02-20-2017, 11:10 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Cormac - 02-21-2017, 07:27 AM
[DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by sandaoguo - 02-21-2017, 10:19 AM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Tsunamy - 02-21-2017, 11:57 AM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Roavin - 02-23-2017, 08:04 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Tsunamy - 02-23-2017, 10:42 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Roavin - 02-24-2017, 11:00 AM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Escade - 02-21-2017, 10:39 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Roavin - 02-23-2017, 07:51 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Escade - 02-24-2017, 08:15 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by Tim - 02-25-2017, 05:59 PM
RE: [DISCUSSION] In-Game Governance - by lamb - 03-04-2017, 10:35 AM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .