A few questions:

How would the Delegate of the South Pacific be elected under this system?

How would executive Delegates of other Coalition regions, if applicable, be elected under this system?

How would a region leave the Coalition? Presumably the Coalition Assembly would replace regional off-site forum legislatures, unless I'm misunderstanding how this would work, so I'm not sure how leaving the Coalition would work. Specifically, how would the South Pacific leave the interregional Coalition, but still keep off-site forum government for the South Pacific intact?

I have to say I'm skeptical of any federal system that would create an institutional divide between the forum and game-side communities, for the reasons I've already articulated, and that I'm not really seeing myself being able to support this proposal if it's crafted into legislation. But I'll keep an open mind and wait to see the actual legislation, should any result from this, before making a final decision on whether to support it.

Incidentally, though this probably deserves its own thread, I agree with Roavin that the Council on Regional Security is ill-equipped, as an institution, to handle intelligence and counterintelligence. Handling game-side regional security is not the same thing as handling intelligence and counterintelligence, and being skilled and competent in doing the former does not make one skilled and competent in doing the latter.