(08-04-2018, 07:47 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:

The Court thanks both counsels for their contributions. Having considered the arguments put forward by both, it would to like to make the following comments:

To Mall:

• You are requested to produce as evidence the full contents of the conversation between your client and Imkitopia, as referenced in both parties' testimonies.
  
• The counsel for the Cabinet contends that the conversation between your client and Imkitopia was in response for actions by Roavin, unrelated to any attempt to form a bilateral relationship. Does your client stand by his assertion on the nature of this conversation?
  
• The Court similarly recognises your concerns on the matter of the term used for Item D of your client's proscription, and will rule accordingly in a subsequent comment.
  
• The Court recognises your right to cross-examine evidence against your client, but also recognises that the Judicial Act requires a certain level of confidentiality for evidence of a classified nature. Therefore, it will make a determination on its possible availability to you once it has had a chance to review the evidence.
  

I thank the Court for its prompt response, I will endeavor to compile sufficient answers to these inquiries in a timely manner. If the Court has any further questions that it develops as things proceed I would be happy to answer those as well.