(08-26-2018, 06:59 PM)Ryccia Wrote: ...When you have to put "don't do this as part of a political rivalry" into the law, you just know your region is fucked.

I may be willing to support the first proposal (the one regarding forbidding administrators from holding political office), but the second is just unacceptable. The mere possibility of a recall process for the administration is just a foul one, one that we should not prosecute at any time. It will set a horrific precedent which this region cannot afford, as when the administration is politicized thoroughly, you get the Sinker's package: coups, general instability, corruption, the whole deal.

I shiver with fear thinking about legislation that shall only serve to further politicize the administration. There is already controversy regarding the issue of toxicity. Do we wish to forge an optimal breeding ground for poison? Is this what we want? A region filled with toxicity? The risk of an administration so unbearably toxic, anything related to it will be radioactive waste of the highest order? Whatever you believe of the current administrative team, this will only serve to advance the destruction of the region from the inside.

Please note, the language was taken from the Charter of the Coalition without any particular changes other than applying it to the administration team. The Charter, if you need to peruse it before launching into empty hyperbolic speeches, is available here:
http://tspforums.xyz/thread-4111.html

It would behoove one to familiarize themselves with the language of the charter before referring to it as toxic. 

On the other hand, it seems that a few select players have very little faith in the Assembly and the Legislators and that sort of thinking in itself is highly anti-democratic. 

When the administration, barring one member, has chosen to involve itself in every political sphere - to the degree that they now dominate the one institution mean to check them is of a deep concern.

Ryccia, parsing through your rhetoric - is it possible that you are arguing that no administration member should hold any office is another solution to this grave problem? If so, then perhaps we can expect administration members to choose whether they will be court justices or admin but have to choose one and not the other. Or make that a legal provision that no administration member may hold any type of political position at all. If so, please propose the language for it or post it as an alternate proposal.

Think of how important it is, considering how many new players we recently have joining us that want to contribute, that the same few won't be holding multiple positions across all three branches of government.