Messages In This Thread

**Belschaft** · 02-14-2019, 09:32 AM

(02-14-2019, 01:44 AM)Amerion Wrote:
(02-14-2019, 12:23 AM)USoVietnam Wrote: Considering recalling by the Assembly is already a mechanism to remove incompetent legislator committee members and other independent institutions don't have reconfirmation votes, this thing is redundant, unnecessary, and only serves the purpose of making being a CoA harder.

Emphasis mine.

Personally, I am happy with the current arrangement. It goes a little way in holding our officials accountable. True, the Assembly has a mechanism to remove the scourge of incompetence but the present system has few detriments other than a (very) minor inconvenience to the Chair. A good Chair should already be aware of when reconfirmation votes are due (<.<).

If anything, I would argue for the High Court to also be subject to reconfirmation votes ...

And the CRS; any permanent appointment, really - though I think there might be an argument for making it less frequent.

_{Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making}
^{Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator}

PREVIOUS ROLES

(This post was last modified: 02-14-2019, 09:33 AM by Belschaft.)