I wish to inform the Court that the Complaintant in this file his chosen to not wait for a ruling on this matter but instead chose to engage in a series of double posting yesterday in a what he claimed was a protest.

Instead of waiting for this court to rule the Complainant has chosen to take actions clearly in violation of the law.

https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686583
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686674
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686695
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686766
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686846
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686875
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686898
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686926
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686967
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686983
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34687019
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34687052
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34687358
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34687404
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34687421
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688116
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688116
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688531
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688546

(these quote point to the initial posts, that were followed by the improper double posts, which were then suppressed in accordance with the policy)

During this time The Complainant blocked telegrams from myself and refused to discuss his concerns privately.  The Complainant alleges that a warning that his post had been suppressed, directions on how to edit the post and link of the RMB guidelines constituted spam.

These actions show a clear lack of respect for this court, the region and its processes and laws. I request that the Court admonish the complainant for trolling and affirm the legally constituted status of the RMB Guidelines.