(03-09-2019, 08:01 AM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote: I can't tell if this is a joke complaint or not, his telegrams fit his own definition of spam is his own policy.

I refer the Courts attention to the referenced definition of spam in the RMB guidelines available at https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1177407

Spamming is probably best described as a post that is either meaningless and unnecessary, a.k.a. a post that repeats the same thing multiple times, multiple posts of the same thing, a series of posts that have no apparent meaning,etc.

After suppressing one of his double posts I sent was this telegram:
Sorry I had to suppress the second in a row post you made. The information is visible with one mouse click, and if you prefer you can edit into your first comment. Our RMB guidelines can be found at https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1177407

This Telegram clearly is not meaningless and unnecessary.

NHC replied with some mild profanity.

I replied:
just maintaining the standard policy you are pushing so hard for :-) have a great night.Kindly maintain a respectful tone with all in game communication. Thank-you.

When I suppressed an additional double post I sent this telegram:
 Once again Sorry I had to suppress the second in a row post you made. The information is visible with one mouse click, and if you prefer you can edit into your first comment.Our RMB guidelines can be found at https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1177407

NHC replied with a Telegram I deemed hostile.

I replied:
I'm just sending that TG when I suppress a post for double posting. Most people get the message after the first one.There's no need for such hostility. thank-you, have a great night.

NHC replied.

I replied:
 I haven't used any form of mild profanity with you, and am sending you friendly and gentle communication.What you choose to do with that isn't under my sphere of influence.Have a great evening!

NHC replied.

I replied:
Well you be you and I'll be me.Have a great night

When I suppressed third post I was unable to send a more serious as he had blocked me.  I would note that this was occurring during NHC's episode of extensive illegal double posting that evening, during which time all three local councilors were suppressing double posts.

Sending a notice and copy of guidelines is something I began doing earlier that day and in most other case it has resulting in that person either editing the double post into the first, or deleting the second post.  In no cases has it lead to a public discussion of the suppression of the initial post, which is exactly the purpose and intent of the warning.

NHC's public allegations that I am engaging in telegram spamming by sending a warning when suppressing, or replying to his telegrams is clearly false or grossly misleading information and done so to damage my standing in the region for his own purposes.  This is exactly the definition of defamation.