We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Poll: Do you support?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
WA Delegate Elections
17.65%
3 17.65%
A Unicameral Assembly
5.88%
1 5.88%
Both
11.76%
2 11.76%
Neither
64.71%
11 64.71%
Total 17 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Restoring the WA Electorate: Unicameral Assembly and Delegacy Elections
#41

I don't think so, Unibot. I think it's that way with all GCRs, even if you're all willing to pretend otherwise. GCR communities exist offsite. The Gameside is a formality, sometimes welcome, other times ignored.
Reply
#42

(02-01-2015, 01:52 PM)Sandaoguo Wrote: @Tsu: That is definitely where we split in our views. I do not think the mechanics of the WA Delegate seat in the game are all that important to how the forum community functions. Very, very little of what we do relies on the game mechanics of the region. I think the way you see things, while a popular view and an intuitive one, doesn't match how forum-based governments work in practice. The WA Delegate seat is, to me, simply a convenient symbol. We could have a caretaker nation be WA Delegate for life, sharing its password with the relevant TSP leaders, and literally nothing would change in the forum game.

I actually agree with this, in theory. Beyond the obvious that a "care taker" nation would flout WA regulations.

In reality, this is why (initially) the delegate was set up more as a constitutional monarchy. It was passed from one nation to another under the understanding that they offsite forum government would be the legitimate government. (Hence, why there was initially a "vice president" role that actually ran the government.)

My point is that -- whether or not you recognize its power -- the WA Delegate seat is, in fact, powerful. If someone decided to change the WFE, promote another forum and whatever, this forum would quickly lose participants.

Let me just throw this out there. Say we went back to a system where the head of state was elected and the delegate preformed a more caretaker role and/or acted as a MoGA -- would you be more inclined to allow RMB voting and the like?
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
Reply
#43

[warn=unofficial]I have split all recent posts and moved them to the Assembly, because they have nothing to do with the original proposal.[/warn]
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .